RRB Secundrabad SSE 1/2015 Results


 RRB Secundrabad SSE 1/2015 Results



Today 9-02-2016 RRB Secundrabad has given the final results of Senior Section Engineer for the Notification 1/2015 Held around 3 months Back in Oct 2015

Here you can find the Results of final Selected Candidates for Document Verification (approx 22 MB)






Final List of mars of all candidates (Approx 11.3 MB)






Now it’s Time to Play with marks



Find the excel Sheet Below (5 MB) so you can sort it yourself and find the ranks in increasing and decreasing order in whatever way you want







Enjoy





Please Subscribe ...More Subscriber More Posts

OBC Category Explained

OBC Category Explained



Lets take a Imaginary family with names in all our examples and explanations
Father---- Rajesh
Mother --- Rani
Son------ Satish
Daughter---- Swapna


Query 1
Whether the sons and daughters of parents either of whom or both are directly recruited into Class-II / Group-B / Group-II and not got promotion into Class-I / Group-A / Group-I at the age of 40 or earlier be treated to be falling in Creamy Layer (i.e. Rule of exclusion)?

Ans

  • If both the parents are directly recruited into Class-II / Group-B / Group-II then their children will automatically fall under Creamy Layer, irrespective of their subsequent promotion to Class-I / Group-A / Group-I. Their children are disentitled to reservation (i.e Fall Under Creamy Status).

Ex:
 Let Rajesh and Rani Both are recruited directly in class II / Group-B / Group II then Satish / Swapna will not be eligible for Non Creamy Status whether their parents  are promoted or not. So they will be Treated as creamy so inturn general Candidates

  • If only one of the parents is directly recruited into Class – II /Group – B / Group-II, the children will fall in the Creamy Layer only when the parent gets promotion into Class – I/ Group – A /Group-I at the age of 40 or earlier.
Ex

Let Rajesh age is 25 at his Joining and rani is house wife and rajesh got recruited in class II/Group B/ Group II and he got promotion into Class – I/ Group – A /Group-I at age 39(i.e Below 40(40 included)) then Satish/Swapna will Not be eligible for Non Creamy and they are treated as creamy so in turn General Candidates.


  • On the contrary, if the promotion to Class-I / Group-A / Group-I is after 40 years, then the children will not fall in the Creamy Layer category.
Ex

Let Rajesh age is 25 at his Joining and rani is house wife and rajesh got recruited in class II/Group B/ Group II and he got promotion into Class – I/ Group – A /Group-I at age 45 (i.e above 40(40 Excluded)) then Satish/Swapna will be eligible for Non Creamy and they can enjoy OBC reservation


Query 2
Whether the sons and daughter of parents either of whom or both are directly recruited into Class-III / Group-C / Group-III will fall in Creamy Layer (i.e. Rule of exclusion)?

No. (Meaning They Fall in NON Creamy Category)

Explanation

  •       Only when either of the parents is recruited into Class-I / Group-A / Group-I or when both the parents are recruited into Class-II / Group-B / Group-II, the children will fall in the Creamy Layer.

Ex
Let Rajesh and Rani Both directly Recruited as into Class III/Group C/ Group III posts then satish / Swapna Fall under NON creamy Status

But when Rajesh is Directly Recruited as Class-I / Group-A / Group-I and Rani is House Wife or Rani is Directly Recruited in Class-I / Group-A / Group-I and Rajesh is not in Class-I / Group-A / Group-I … Then Swapna/Satish DONOT Come under NON Creamy Status and they are treated as Creamy Layer Candidates and inturn General Candidates

And also if

Let Rajesh and Rani Both are recruited directly in class II / Group-B / Group II then Satish / Swapna will not be eligible for Non Creamy Status So they will be Treated as creamy so inturn general Candidates

  •        When either of the or both the parents are recruited into Class-III / Group-C / Group-III or Class-IV / Group-D / Group-IV, the children will not fall in the Creamy Layer. This position remains the same even when one of the or both the parents get promotion to Class-I / Group-A / Group-I before the age of 40 years itself.

Ex:
Let Rajesh and Rani Both directly Recruited as into Class III/Group C/ Group III or Class-IV / Group-D / Group-IV, and Let they both have been promoted Class-I / Group-A / Group-I at age of 39(below 40) then still their Children  satish / Swapna Fall under NON creamy Status

If they are promoted From Class III/Group C/ Group III or Class-IV / Group-D / Group-IV, at age of 45 (above 40) still satish /swapna Belong to NON Creamy OBC status(Refer Query 1)

Let Rajesh Both directly Recruited as into Class III/Group C/ Group III or Class-IV / Group-D / Group-IV, and Rani House wife and Let  Rajesh  have been promoted to Class-I / Group-A / Group-I at age of 39(below 40) then still his Children  satish / Swapna Fall under NON creamy Status

If Rajesh is promoted From Class III/Group C/ Group III or Class-IV / Group-D / Group-IV, at age of 45 (above 40) still satish /swapna Belong to NON Creamy OBC status(Refer Query 1)


Query 3

Whether the sons and daughters of parents of whom husband is directly recruited into Class-III / Group-C / Group-III or Class-IV / Group-D / Group-IV and he got promotion at the age of 40 or earlier be treated to be falling in creamy Layer (i.e. Rule of exclusion)?


No. (Meaning they are still treated as Non Creamy Status)

Explanation:
Same As ABOVE (Infact Already Explained above)




Query 4

Whether a candidate who himself is a directly recruited Class-I/Group-A /Group-I or Class-II / Group-B /Group-II officer who got into Class-I / Group-A / Group-I at the age of 40 or earlier be treated to be falling in Creamy Layer (i.e. Rule of exclusion) on the basis of his own service status?

No. (Meaning they are still treated as Non Creamy Status)

Explanations:

  • It is clarified that the Creamy Layer status of a candidate is determined on the basis of the status of his parents and not on the basis of his own status or income of his / her spouse. While determining the Creamy Layer status of a person, the status or the income of the candidate himself or of his / her spouse shall not be taken into account.

Ex

Let Satish/Swapna is Direclty Recruited as Class-I/Group-A /Group-I or Class-II / Group-B /Group-II officer and later Prompted to Class-I / Group-A / Group-I at age of 39 then he still belong to Non Creamy Status as The creamy or Non Creamy Status Depend only on rajesh/Rani --Status / income But not on His own service status.


Query 5

Whether a candidate whose annual gross income is more than Rs. 4.5 Lakh per annum (Rs.4.00 Lakh only in the case of Govt. of A.P.) be treated to be falling in the Creamy Layer (i.e. Rule of exclusion) on the basis of his own income?


No. (Meaning they are still treated as Non Creamy Status)

  • It is clarified that the Creamy Layer status of a candidate is determined on the basis of the income of parents and not on the basis of his own income of his / her spouse. While determining the Creamy Layer status of a person, the status or the income of the candidate himself or of his / her spouse shall not be taken into account

Ex:

Let Satish/Swapna Has a Annual Income of 7 Lakhs Per annum then he will fall in OBC Creamy or Non Creamy Depending On the Salary of his Parents (Rajesh/Rani) But Not on His Own salary.(See Query 6 for Better Understanding)

Query 6 (**Most Important and Largest Misconception In OBC Status **)

What is the scope of the explanation “income from salaries and agricultural land shall not be clubbedgiven under income / wealth test?
What is its implication to the sons and daughters of employees working under State and Central Govts, Public under-takings, Universities, Banks, Insurance organizations etc?

Explanation:

  • The scope of the explanation is that while applying the income / wealth test to determine Creamy Layer status of any candidate, the income from the salaries and income from the agricultural land shall not be taken into account. In addition, they shall not be clubbed with the income from other sources also.(i.e if they have business etc)

  • It means, if the income from salary / salaries of the parents of a candidate is more than Rs.4.50 Lakh per annum (Rs.4.00 Lakh only under Govt. of A.P), income from agricultural land is also more than Rs.4.50 Lakh per annum (Rs.4.00 Lakh only under Govt. of A.P),but income from other sources is less than Rs. 4.50 Lakh per annum (Rs.4.00 Lakh only under Govt. of A.P), the candidate shall not be treated to be falling in the Creamy Layer on the basis of income / wealth test, provided his parents do not possess wealth above the exemption limit prescribed in the Wealth Tax Act for a period of three consecutive years.

  • It clearly indicates that income from salaries and agriculture shall not be taken into account or they be clubbed with income from other sources while applying the income / wealth test.

  • It is very likely that the authorities connected with issue of caste certificates may club the income from salary and income from agriculture also and deny BC / OBC Caste Certificates to eligible candidates on the basis of income criterion i.e. income exceeding the prescribed limit.
 It is, in fact, against the existing rule position.

  • This has relevance particularly to the sons and daughter of employees working under State and Central Govts, Public undertakings, Universities, Banks, Insurance organizations etc. The salary and agricultural income of the parents shall not be taken into account for determining the Creamy layer status for their children
But, if they have income more than Rs. 4.50 Lakh per annum (Rs.4.00 Lakh only under Govt. of A.P) from other sources, only then they be treated to come in the Creamy Layer category.

Ex
Let Rajesh is Working in State and Central Govts, Public undertakings, Universities, Banks, Insurance organizations or even in private Organizations etc in any one of the Above organization And earns a salary more than 6 Lakhs Per Annum and He also Posses a land where on it he cultivated rice and earned 5 lakhs per annum so total 11 lakhs per annum he is earning and let these two are only source of his income and his survival so even though it crossed the slab of 4.5 Lakh per annum Still his Children fall under Non Creamy Status as Agricultutre and Salary are not included in determining the Slab of 4.5 Lakhs.

Now Again,

Let Rajesh is Working in State and Central Govts, Public undertakings, Universities, Banks, Insurance organizations or even in private Organizations etc in any one of the Above organization And earns a salary more than 6 Lakhs Per Annum and He also Posses a land where on it he cultivated rice and earned 5 lakhs per annum so total 11 lakhs per annum and he kept a cloth shop/any Business in his area let he earns 5 lakhs Per annum  and this is treated as other source of Income and 5 lakhs per Annum is treated as above the maximum slab of 4.5 Lakhs Per Annum so his children(Satish/Swapna) doesn’t fall under NON Creamy and they are treated as creamy so in turn general.



*******So whether The Slab is 4.5 Lakhs per annum or 6 lakhs annum or anything if increased in future the explanation Remains the same*****
 

Delhi Metro Cutoff 2015 ASSITANT MANAGER Electrical

Delhi Metro Cutoff




How to File RTI


How to File RTI- Step By Step Procedure
  

RTI Act

·         The Right to Information Act (RTI) is an Act of the Parliament of India "to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens" and replaces the erstwhile Freedom of information Act, 2002.
·         The Act applies to all States and Union Territories of India except “Jammu & Kashmir”.
·         Under the provisions of the Act, any citizen may request information from a "public authority" (a body of Government or "instrumentality of State") which is required to reply expeditiously or within thirty days.
·          The Act also requires every public authority to computerise their records for wide dissemination and to proactively certain categories of information so that the citizens need minimum recourse to request for information formally.
·         This law was passed by Parliament on 15 June 2005 and came fully into force on 12 October 2005.
·         The first application was given to a Pune police station. Information disclosure in India was restricted by the Official Secrets Act 1923 and various other special laws, which the new RTI Act relaxes. It codifies a fundamental right of citizens.

Step By Step Procedure click here
Exclusions:
·         Central Intelligence and Security agencies specified in the Second Schedule like IB, Directorate General of Income tax(Investigation), RAW, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, Directorate of Enforcement, Narcotics Control Bureau, Aviation Research Centre, Special Frontier Force, BSF, CRPF, ITBP, CISF, NSG, Assam Rifles, Special Service Bureau, Special Branch (CID), Andaman and Nicobar, The Crime Branch-CID-CB, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Special Branch, Lakshadweep Police etc. will be excluded.
·         Agencies specified by the State Governments through a Notification will also be excluded.
·         The exclusion, however, is not absolute and these organizations have an obligation to provide information pertaining to allegations of corruption and human rights violations. Further, information relating to allegations of human rights violation could be given but only with the approval of the Central or State Information Commission.

Step By Step Procedure click here

 The following is exempt from disclosure under section 8 of the Act:-
·         Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, "strategic, scientific or economic" interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offense;
·         Information which has been expressly forbidden to be published by any court of law or tribunal or the disclosure of which may constitute contempt of court;
·         Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of privilege of Parliament or the State Legislature;
·         Information including commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party, unless the competent authority is satisfied that larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information;
·         Information available to a person in his fiduciary relationship, unless the competent authority is satisfied that the larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information;
·         Information received in confidence from foreign Government;
·         Information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes;
·         Information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders;
·         Cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers, Secretaries and other officers;
·         Information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual (but it is also provided that the information which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature shall not be denied by this exemption);
Notwithstanding any of the exemptions listed above, a public authority may allow access to information, if public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests. However, this does not apply to disclosure of "trade or commercial secrets protected by law ".

Step By Step Procedure click here